Remember anything.
For life.
Make flashcards for words, questions, formulas and pictures. Sort them into concept groups, track what you know, and study on any device.
Make flashcards for words, questions, formulas and pictures. Sort them into concept groups, track what you know, and study on any device.
Simple enough for a quick vocab list, flexible enough for a whole degree.
Put a word, question, diagram or photo on either side. Paste screenshots straight in.
Organize cards into categories like Biology, GRE words or Interview prep, and study one group at a time.
Mark cards as Learning, Almost, Learned, Confused or Hard, then focus on the ones that need work.
Cards come back right before you would forget them, on a series you choose like 3, 7 and 30 days, with email reminders.
Your cards and images are tied to your account. Nobody else can see them.
Add a card on your laptop, review it on your phone. Everything stays in sync.
Two study techniques come out on top again and again: active recall (testing yourself instead of rereading) and spaced repetition (reviewing over growing gaps of time). Here is the evidence, and how we built it into Flashcards for Life.
In 1885 Hermann Ebbinghaus memorized lists and measured how much easier they were to relearn after a delay. Within a day, most of the benefit of studying was gone. After a month, only about a fifth remained.
Measure: "savings", how much less time relearning took compared with the first time.
| Time after learning | Savings |
|---|---|
| 20 minutes | 58% |
| 1 hour | 44% |
| 9 hours | 36% |
| 1 day | 34% |
| 2 days | 28% |
| 6 days | 25% |
| 31 days | 21% |
Students read short passages, then either reread them or tried to recall them from memory. Five minutes later, rereading looked slightly better. But two days and one week later, the students who tested themselves remembered far more.
Rereading feels productive. Recall is what actually lasts.
| Final test | Reread | Tested themselves |
|---|---|---|
| 5 minutes | 81% | 75% |
| 2 days | 54% | 68% |
| 1 week | 42% | 56% |
Students learned 40 Swahili words. Some kept testing themselves on words they already knew. Others dropped those words from testing but kept studying them. One week later the difference was enormous.
Studying more did not help. Retrieving more did.
A major review of spacing research found spaced study beat cramming across 317 experiments.
Cepeda et al., 2006, Psychological BulletinIn a flashcard study, spacing beat cramming for 90% of students...
Kornell, 2009, Applied Cognitive Psychology...yet most students thought cramming had worked better. Our intuition about learning is often wrong.
Kornell, 2009A meta-analysis of 272 effects found testing clearly improves learning, a medium to large effect.
Adesope et al., 2017, Review of Educational ResearchA landmark review rated ten popular study techniques on how well they work across students, subjects and situations. Just two were rated high utility: practice testing and distributed (spaced) practice. Highlighting and rereading, the most popular habits, were rated low.
Flashcards for Life is built around exactly those two.
You see one side and try to remember the other before flipping. Every review asks you to recall, never just reread.
Choose gaps like 3, 7 and 30 days. Again, Hard, Good and Easy move each card along its series.
An email on the days cards are due, so reviews happen when they matter most.
Tags and review counts show what you really know, not what only feels familiar.
Figures are taken from the published studies and rounded to whole numbers.
Flashcards for Life is proudly sponsored by the Lumino Institute of Education Economics (LIEE).
Sign up with your email in a few seconds.
Words, questions, pictures. Put them in concept groups.
Flip, tag, and watch your Learned count grow.
It takes less than a minute to make your first card.
Log in to keep studying.
Cards come back on these days. Tap a card to change its schedule.
Turn on spaced repetition for many cards at once. You can also do it per card in the card editor.